Incorrect Privilege Assignment-with the potential to “expose cryptographic secrets used to protect election information-with the additional potential to affect other election equipment.Authentication Bypass by Spoofing-making the machine vulnerable to forgery.Execution with unnecessary privileges-allowing the execution of code to elevate privileges.Path Traversal-or the ability to manipulate and cause arbitrary code execution, which could in turn “spread malicious code to ImageCastX devices from the Election Management System (EMS).”.Improper protection of Alternate Path-which allows for rebooting in Android Safe Mode, allowing direct access to the operating system which could lead to escalation of privileges or the installation of malicious code.Hidden functionality-with the potential to give an “attacker” elevated privileges on a device.Mutable attestation which could allow the “disguise of “malicious applications on a device.”.The other listed vulnerabilities in the report are summarized as follows: “An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to install malicious code,” CISA reported, “Which could also be spread to other vulnerable ImageCast X devices via removable media.” For example, CISA found “improper verification of cryptographic signature CWE-347.” Application signatures must be validated to a “trusted root certificate.” Processes that lack validation to the root certificate render the equipment vulnerable to undetected tampering. The vulnerabilities are not insignificant. It also hasn't publicly stated what other versions share these vulns (if any). The vendor didn't give us or CISA access to test other versions or their claimed fixes. Notably, “other versions were not able to be tested.” Drew Springall, who teamed up with Halderman, explains, “the vendor didn’t give us or CISA access to test other versions.”ģ/ We only tested two software versions of a single EAC-certified system (as part of a pre-2020 lawsuit in GA). – CISA finally acknowledges critical vulnerabilities /4QjkY7rZBoĪccording to the report, the following versions of the Dominion Voting Systems ImageCastX software are now known to be affected. S– report filed in & sealed by Federal court J– critical vulnerabilities report issued Update: Fed Timeline Acknowledging Halderman Report Alex Halderman, said in sworn declarations filed publicly with the court that he examined the Dominion Voting Systems machines for 12 weeks and identified “multiple severe security flaws” that would allow bad actors to install malicious software.” The report has been under seal since July (of 2021) in federal court in Atlanta, part of a long-running lawsuit challenging Georgia’s voting machines. “The document should not be made public until the agency has had time to assess and mitigate potential risks. Last week privately advised states about vulnerabilities in the Dominion ImageCast X that and I discovered (as part of a lawsuit in Georgia that predates the 2020 election).ĬISA has now made a version of their advisory public: Raffensperger case that has been ongoing since 2019. The report was sealed by Federal Judge Amy Totenberg in the Curling v. Alex Halderman claiming the Dominion ImageCastX has vulnerabilities that could be exploited. While these risks should be mitigated as soon as possible, we have no evidence they have been exploited in any elections.ĬISA has kept under wraps for almost a year a report from University of Michigan computer scientist J. My statement on today’s advisory on vulnerabilities affecting certain versions of Dominion Voting Systems’ software.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |